 (12)_1742981672.jpeg)
The chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, Neda Imaseun, has defined why Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s sexual harassment case towards the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, was tossed out by the panel.
Throughout a sitting on Tuesday, March 25, the panel declared that the sexual harassment case introduced earlier than it was closed.
Giving purpose for this, Imasuen mentioned Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s first petition was signed by herself, which contravenes the legal guidelines of the Senate.
Imaseun spoke on Tuesday whereas responding to a remark by Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyer, Abiola Akiode, who accused him of bias.
Earlier, Akiode requested Imaseun to step down as chairman of the Senate panel.
“Our intention is that, if we’re going to proceed, we would like the chair to please step down from this dialog to permit for equity and justice in accordance with the structure of this nation,” Akiode mentioned.
Responding, Imaseun mentioned the case is already earlier than the court docket, and the committee will keep out of the matter.
“Let me inform you, the primary petition that got here earlier than us was signed by Distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. Opposite to our guidelines, you can not signal your individual petition. The petition that got here earlier than us didn’t even have an handle. Opposite to our guidelines, that petition shouldn’t have been entertained.
“In any case, for the place that I can see you take, it means the entire senate is biased. As a result of the entire Senate witnessed what occurred. So, I don’t know what ad-hoc committee you will represent that’s not conscious of what has been occurring.
“Realized respondent (Akpabio’s counsel) has simply instructed us that this matter is earlier than the regulation court docket, and I’ll handle that by our rule e-book. I’ll handle that by our rule e-book, order 40 (7), which says ‘senate mustn’t obtain or deliberate on any matter to which actions are pending in any court docket of regulation’. That is our rule e-book.
“Subsequently, the petitioner mentioned he wouldn’t communicate to his petition as a result of the committee is biased, the respondent has simply instructed us that this case is earlier than a reliable court docket of regulation, subsequently, this committee will permit the court docket of regulation, that won’t be biased, to deal with this matter.
“Subsequently, this matter is closed right here on the senate and it’s adjourned sine die.”
In the meantime, Akpoti-Uduaghan has instituted a contempt software towards Imasuen and Senate President Godswill Akpabio over her suspension.
The chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, Neda Imaseun, has defined why Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s sexual harassment case towards the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, was tossed out by the panel.
Throughout a sitting on Tuesday, March 25, the panel declared that the sexual harassment case introduced earlier than it was closed.
Giving purpose for this, Imasuen mentioned Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s first petition was signed by herself, which contravenes the legal guidelines of the Senate.
Imaseun spoke on Tuesday whereas responding to a remark by Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyer, Abiola Akiode, who accused him of bias.
Earlier, Akiode requested Imaseun to step down as chairman of the Senate panel.
“Our intention is that, if we’re going to proceed, we would like the chair to please step down from this dialog to permit for equity and justice in accordance with the structure of this nation,” Akiode mentioned.
Responding, Imaseun mentioned the case is already earlier than the court docket, and the committee will keep out of the matter.
“Let me inform you, the primary petition that got here earlier than us was signed by Distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. Opposite to our guidelines, you can not signal your individual petition. The petition that got here earlier than us didn’t even have an handle. Opposite to our guidelines, that petition shouldn’t have been entertained.
“In any case, for the place that I can see you take, it means the entire senate is biased. As a result of the entire Senate witnessed what occurred. So, I don’t know what ad-hoc committee you will represent that’s not conscious of what has been occurring.
“Realized respondent (Akpabio’s counsel) has simply instructed us that this matter is earlier than the regulation court docket, and I’ll handle that by our rule e-book. I’ll handle that by our rule e-book, order 40 (7), which says ‘senate mustn’t obtain or deliberate on any matter to which actions are pending in any court docket of regulation’. That is our rule e-book.
“Subsequently, the petitioner mentioned he wouldn’t communicate to his petition as a result of the committee is biased, the respondent has simply instructed us that this case is earlier than a reliable court docket of regulation, subsequently, this committee will permit the court docket of regulation, that won’t be biased, to deal with this matter.
“Subsequently, this matter is closed right here on the senate and it’s adjourned sine die.”
In the meantime, Akpoti-Uduaghan has instituted a contempt software towards Imasuen and Senate President Godswill Akpabio over her suspension.
